Community in 5 languagesGlobal + local opinion
Trending in United StatesGlobal Top 100What the World SaysCategoriesCountriesHow We Rank
TRENDEESPT
Comparison

Google Tensor G6 vs Intel Core Ultra 5 338H

Which processor is better?

These processors target different device classes, so there is no shared winner.

Comparison confidence: Low9 of 19 comparable specifications present on both · 1 independent signal decided this
Spec advantage
Google Tensor G62Intel Core Ultra 5 338H3

How many rows each one leads. Not the verdict: a Bluetooth version and CPU performance cannot carry the same weight.

CPU5050Not decided
Graphics / Gaming5050Not decided
Efficiency5842
AI5050Not decided
Camera & Media5050Not decided
Memory5050Not decided
Connectivity5050Not decided
Where Google Tensor G6 has the edge
  • Different device classes: mobile SoC and laptop processor
  • Newer manufacturing process: 3 nm against Intel 18A
Where Intel Core Ultra 5 338H has the edge
  • Different device classes: mobile SoC and laptop processor
Which is better for what?
  • GamingNot enough data
  • AINot enough data
  • CameraNot enough data
  • EfficiencyNot enough data
  • Device choiceGoogle Tensor G6
  • ValueKacbu stores no prices
Choose Google Tensor G6 if…
  • you are shopping for a flagship class processor
  • Efficiency is what decides it for you
  • you are buying one of the devices that use this chip
Go to product page
Choose Intel Core Ultra 5 338H if…
  • you are shopping for a upper midrange class processor
  • you are buying one of the devices that use this chip
Go to product page

Frequently asked

Which one is faster?

Clock speed and core count are not directly comparable across architectures, so Kacbu does not score them: it prints them and leaves the decision to the fields that can be measured. These processors target different device classes, so there is no shared winner.

Which is better for gaming?

There is not enough data to decide Graphics / Gaming.

Which is more efficient?

There is not enough data to decide Efficiency.

Which is better for AI?

There is not enough data to decide AI.

Which one should I choose?

These processors target different device classes, so there is no shared winner.

How reliable is this comparison?

Comparison confidence: Low. 9 of 19 comparable specifications are present on both, and 1 independent signal decided it.

This decision engine reads the manufacturers own specification pages. A row that cannot be scored is not scored, and a missing value never hands the other side a win.

General

ManufacturerGoogleIntel
FamilyGoogle TensorPanther Lake
SegmentMobile flagship SoCThin Performance Laptop

CPU

Number of CoresShown for context, not scored712
ThreadShown for context, not scored712
Performance CoreShown for context, not scored54
Efficiency CoreShown for context, not scored28 (4 E + 4 LP-E)
ArchitectureNot decidedArm C1-Ultra / C1-ProPanther Lake
Boost frequencyShown for context, not scored4.1 GHz4.7 GHz

Graphics / Gaming

Integrated GraphicsNot decidedPowerVR CXTP-48-1536Intel Arc B370 GPU

Efficiency

Manufacturing Process3 nm AdvantageIntel 18A

Platform

SocketBGA (SoC)FCBGA2540

General

ManufacturerGoogleIntel
FamilyGoogle TensorPanther Lake
SegmentMobile flagship SoCThin Performance Laptop
Release YearShown for context, not scored20262026

CPU

Number of CoresShown for context, not scored712
ThreadShown for context, not scored712
Performance CoreShown for context, not scored54
Efficiency CoreShown for context, not scored28 (4 E + 4 LP-E)
ArchitectureNot decidedArm C1-Ultra / C1-ProPanther Lake
Boost frequencyShown for context, not scored4.1 GHz4.7 GHz
Base FrequencyShown for context, not scoredNo data1.9 GHz (P-core)
Efficiency-Core Clock2.65 GHzNo data
L3 cacheShown for context, not scoredNo data18 MB
Cache NoteGoogle does not publish detailed cache sizesNo data

Graphics / Gaming

Integrated GraphicsNot decidedPowerVR CXTP-48-1536Intel Arc B370 GPU
Xe CoresShown for context, not scoredNo data10
Graphics ClockShown for context, not scoredNo data2.4 GHz

AI

NPU (TOPS)Shown for context, not scoredNo data47 TOPS

Memory

Memory TypeNot decidedNo dataLPDDR5X 8533 MT/s
Maximum memoryNot decidedNo data96 GB

Efficiency

LithographyNot decided3 nmNo data
Manufacturing Process3 nm AdvantageIntel 18A
TDPShown for context, not scoredNo data25 W
Maximum turbo powerShown for context, not scoredNo data65 W
Cooling SolutionDevice dependentNo data

Platform

SocketBGA (SoC)FCBGA2540

Devices using these processors

Intel Core Ultra 5 338H0 devices

No device in the catalogue uses this chip