Community in 5 languagesGlobal + local opinion
Trending in United StatesGlobal Top 100What the World SaysCategoriesCountriesHow We Rank
TRENDEESPT
Comparison

Google Tensor G4 vs Google Tensor G5

Which processor is better?

Too close to call

Comparison confidence: Low9 of 9 comparable specifications present on both · 2 independent signals decided this
Spec advantage
Google Tensor G40Google Tensor G52

How many rows each one leads. Not the verdict: a Bluetooth version and CPU performance cannot carry the same weight.

CPU5050Not decided
Graphics / Gaming5050Not decided
Efficiency4258
AI5050Not decided
Camera & Media5050Not decided
Memory5050Not decided
Connectivity5050Not decided
Where Google Tensor G5 has the edge
  • Newer manufacturing process: 3 nm against 4 nm
Which is better for what?
  • GamingNot enough data
  • AINot enough data
  • CameraNot enough data
  • EfficiencyGoogle Tensor G5
  • Device choiceGoogle Tensor G5
  • ValueKacbu stores no prices
Choose Google Tensor G4 if…
  • you are buying one of the devices that use this chip
Go to product page
Choose Google Tensor G5 if…
  • Efficiency is what decides it for you
  • you are buying one of the devices that use this chip
Go to product page

Frequently asked

Which one is faster?

Clock speed and core count are not directly comparable across architectures, so Kacbu does not score them: it prints them and leaves the decision to the fields that can be measured. There is nothing to choose between them: overall 49 against 51.

Which is better for gaming?

There is not enough data to decide Graphics / Gaming.

Which is more efficient?

Google Tensor G5 leads on Efficiency.

Which is better for AI?

There is not enough data to decide AI.

Which one should I choose?

There is nothing to choose between them: overall 49 against 51.

How reliable is this comparison?

Comparison confidence: Low. 9 of 9 comparable specifications are present on both, and 2 independent signals decided it.

This decision engine reads the manufacturers own specification pages. A row that cannot be scored is not scored, and a missing value never hands the other side a win.

General

Release YearShown for context, not scored20242025

CPU

Efficiency CoreShown for context, not scored42
ArchitectureCortex-X4 / A720 / A520Cortex-X4 / A725 / A520
Boost frequencyShown for context, not scored3.1 GHz3.78 GHz
Efficiency-Core Clock2.6 GHz3.05 GHz

Graphics / Gaming

Integrated GraphicsNot decidedMali-G715 MC7Imagination DXT GPU

Efficiency

Lithography4 nm3 nm Advantage

General

ManufacturerGoogleGoogle
FamilyGoogle TensorGoogle Tensor
SegmentMobile flagship SoCMobile flagship SoC
Release YearShown for context, not scored20242025

CPU

Number of CoresShown for context, not scored88
ThreadShown for context, not scored88
Performance CoreShown for context, not scored11
Efficiency CoreShown for context, not scored42
ArchitectureCortex-X4 / A720 / A520Cortex-X4 / A725 / A520
Boost frequencyShown for context, not scored3.1 GHz3.78 GHz
Efficiency-Core Clock2.6 GHz3.05 GHz
Cache NoteGoogle does not publish detailed cache sizesGoogle does not publish detailed cache sizes

Graphics / Gaming

Integrated GraphicsNot decidedMali-G715 MC7Imagination DXT GPU

Efficiency

Lithography4 nm3 nm Advantage
Manufacturing ProcessThe same fact filed twiceSamsung 4LPP+TSMC 3nm
Cooling SolutionDevice dependentDevice dependent

Platform

SocketBGA (SoC)BGA (SoC)

Devices using these processors