Samsung QLED Q6F vs TCL C8L
Which one should you buy?
Who leads where?
- DisplayTCL C8L
- ConnectivityTCL C8L
- DesignTCL C8L
Wins are counted from the official values in the table below; the BUY / CONSIDER / WAIT call comes from each product's own decision box. We do not predict prices.
 SamsungSamsung QLED Q6FNo reviews yet |  TCLTCL C8LNo reviews yet | |
|---|---|---|
| Key Differences | ||
| Panel | QLED | SQD-Mini LED |
| Screen Size | 75" | 65" |
| Refresh Rate | 50 Hz | 144 Hz |
| HDMI 2.1 inputs | No data | 4 |
| Sound output (RMS) | 20 W | No data |
| Display | ||
| Size | 75" | 65" |
| Panel | QLED | SQD-Mini LED |
| Resolution | 3840x2160 | 3840x2160 |
| Refresh Rate | 50 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak Brightness | No data | 5000 nits |
| Gaming | ||
| HDMI 2.1 inputs | No data | 4 |
| Variable refresh rate (VRR) | No data | Yes |
| Auto low latency mode (ALLM) | Yes | No data |
| AMD FreeSync | No data | FreeSync |
| HGiG | Yes | No data |
| Audio | ||
| Sound output (RMS) | 20 W | No data |
| Object tracking sound | OTS Lite | No data |
| Smart TV | ||
| Operating System | Tizen | Google TV |
| Security updates guaranteed until (year) | 2030 | No data |
| Voice assistants | No data | Google Assistant |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 3 | 4 |
| HDMI eARC | No data | Yes |
| USB ports | 1 | No data |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | No data | 5.4 |
| Design | ||
| Depth | 77 mm | 50 mm |
| Weight | 22.4 kg | No data |
| VESA mount | 400 × 300 mm | No data |
| Energy | ||
| Standby consumption | 0.5 W | No data |
TCL C8L leads on 3 of 3 compared specs.
This table is based on manufacturers official specifications. Winning on paper does not always mean a difference in everyday use.