Hisense MicroLED MX vs Samsung Neo QLED QN70H
Which one should you buy?
Who leads where?
- DisplayHisense MicroLED MX
- GamingHisense MicroLED MX
- AudioSamsung Neo QLED QN70H
- DesignSamsung Neo QLED QN70H
Wins are counted from the official values in the table below; the BUY / CONSIDER / WAIT call comes from each product's own decision box. We do not predict prices.
 HisenseHisense MicroLED MXNo reviews yet |  SamsungSamsung Neo QLED QN70HNo reviews yet | |
|---|---|---|
| Key Differences | ||
| Panel | MicroLED | Neo QLED (Mini LED) |
| Screen Size | 136" | 55" |
| Refresh Rate | 120 Hz | 50 Hz |
| HDMI 2.1 inputs | 3 | 0 |
| Sound output (RMS) | 2×20 W + 2×10 W + 2×20 W + 2×10 W | 20 W |
| Display | ||
| Size | 136" | 55" |
| Panel | MicroLED | Neo QLED (Mini LED) |
| Resolution | 3840x2160 | No data |
| Refresh Rate | 120 Hz | 50 Hz |
| Maximum refresh rate | 120 Hz | No data |
| Gaming | ||
| HDMI 2.1 inputs | 3 | 0 |
| Maximum HDMI signal | No data | 4K 60 Hz |
| Variable refresh rate (VRR) | Yes | No data |
| Auto low latency mode (ALLM) | Yes | Yes |
| HGiG | No data | Yes |
| Audio | ||
| Sound output (RMS) | 2×20 W + 2×10 W + 2×20 W + 2×10 W | 20 W |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | No data |
| Object tracking sound | No data | OTS Lite |
| Smart TV | ||
| Operating System | VIDAA Smart OS | Tizen |
| Apple AirPlay | Yes | Yes |
| Google Cast | No data | Yes |
| Matter | No data | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 3 | 3 |
| HDMI eARC | Yes | Yes |
| USB ports | 1× USB 2.0, 1× USB 3.0, 1× USB-C | 2× USB-A |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | Yes | No data |
| Design | ||
| Depth | No data | 25.7 mm |
| Weight | 145 kg | 13.8 kg |
| VESA mount | No data | 200 × 200 mm |
| Energy | ||
| Power consumption (typical) | No data | 62 W |
| Standby consumption | 0.5 W | 0.5 W |
The two products are level on the compared specs.
This table is based on manufacturers official specifications. Winning on paper does not always mean a difference in everyday use.