Community in 5 languagesGlobal + local opinion
Trending in United StatesGlobal Top 100What the World SaysCategoriesCountriesHow We Rank
TRENDEESPT
Comparison

Exynos 2600 vs Intel Core 7 350

Which processor is better?

These processors target different device classes, so there is no shared winner.

Exynos 260051Overall
Comparison confidence: Insufficient5 of 15 comparable specifications present on both · 1 independent signals decided this
Spec advantage
Exynos 26004Intel Core 7 3500

How many rows each one leads. Not the verdict: a Bluetooth version and CPU performance cannot carry the same weight.

CPU5050Not decided
Graphics / Gaming5050Not decided
Efficiency5842
AI5050Not decided
Camera & Media5050Not decided
Memory5050Not decided
Connectivity5050Not decided
Where Exynos 2600 has the edge
  • Different device classes: mobile SoC and laptop processor
  • Newer manufacturing process: 2 nm against Intel 18A
Where Intel Core 7 350 has the edge
  • Different device classes: mobile SoC and laptop processor
Which is better for what?
  • GamingNot enough data
  • AINot enough data
  • CameraNot enough data
  • EfficiencyNot enough data
  • Device choiceNot enough data
  • ValueKacbu stores no prices
Choose Exynos 2600 if…
  • Efficiency is what decides it for you
  • you are buying one of the devices that use this chip
Go to product page
Choose Intel Core 7 350 if…
  • you are buying one of the devices that use this chip
Go to product page

Frequently asked

Which one is faster?

Clock speed and core count are not directly comparable across architectures, so Kacbu does not score them: it prints them and leaves the decision to the fields that can be measured. These processors target different device classes, so there is no shared winner.

Which is better for gaming?

There is not enough data to decide Graphics / Gaming.

Which is more efficient?

There is not enough data to decide Efficiency.

Which is better for AI?

There is not enough data to decide AI.

Which one should I choose?

These processors target different device classes, so there is no shared winner.

How reliable is this comparison?

Comparison confidence: Insufficient. 5 of 15 comparable specifications are present on both, and 1 independent signals decided it.

This decision engine reads the manufacturers own specification pages. A row that cannot be scored is not scored, and a missing value never hands the other side a win.

General

ManufacturerSamsungIntel
FamilyExynos 2000Core Series 3
SegmentMobile flagship SoCThin and Light Laptop

CPU

Number of CoresShown for context, not scored106
ThreadShown for context, not scored106
Performance CoreShown for context, not scored42
Efficiency CoreShown for context, not scored64 low-power

Graphics / Gaming

Integrated GraphicsSamsung Xclipse 960Intel Graphics (2.6 GHz)

Efficiency

Manufacturing Process2 nm AdvantageIntel 18A

Platform

SocketBGA (SoC)FCBGA1516 (soldered)

General

ManufacturerSamsungIntel
FamilyExynos 2000Core Series 3
SegmentMobile flagship SoCThin and Light Laptop
Release YearShown for context, not scoredNo data2026

CPU

Number of CoresShown for context, not scored106
ThreadShown for context, not scored106
Performance CoreShown for context, not scored42
Efficiency CoreShown for context, not scored64 low-power
ArchitectureC1-UltraNo data
Boost frequencyShown for context, not scoredNo data4.8 GHz
Base FrequencyShown for context, not scoredNo data1.5 GHz (P-core)
L3 cacheShown for context, not scoredNo data6 MB
Cache NoteSamsung does not publish detailed cache sizesNo data

Graphics / Gaming

Integrated GraphicsSamsung Xclipse 960Intel Graphics (2.6 GHz)
Donanımsal Işın İzlemeNot decidedYesNo data

AI

NPU (TOPS)Shown for context, not scoredNo data17 TOPS

Memory

Memory TypeNot decidedNo dataLPDDR5X-7467 / DDR5-6400

Efficiency

LithographyNot decided2 nmNo data
Manufacturing Process2 nm AdvantageIntel 18A
TDPShown for context, not scoredNo data15 W
Maximum turbo powerShown for context, not scoredNo data35 W
Cooling SolutionDevice dependentNo data

Platform

SocketBGA (SoC)FCBGA1516 (soldered)

Devices using these processors