Community in 5 languagesGlobal + local opinion
Trending in United StatesGlobal Top 100What the World SaysCategoriesCountriesHow We Rank
TRENDEESPT
Comparison

Dimensity 8350 vs Dimensity 9500s

Which processor is better?

Dimensity 9500s wins

Slight edge
Comparison confidence: Low5 of 7 comparable specifications present on both · 2 independent signals decided this
Spec advantage
Dimensity 83500Dimensity 9500s1

How many rows each one leads. Not the verdict: a Bluetooth version and CPU performance cannot carry the same weight.

CPU5050Not decided
Graphics / Gaming5050Not decided
Efficiency4258
AI5050Not decided
Camera & Media5050Not decided
Memory5050Not decided
Connectivity5050Not decided
Why Dimensity 9500s leads
  • flagship class platform against a upper midrange one
  • Newer manufacturing process: 3 nm against 4 nm
Which is better for what?
  • GamingNot enough data
  • AINot enough data
  • CameraNot enough data
  • EfficiencyDimensity 9500s
  • Device choiceDimensity 8350
  • ValueKacbu stores no prices
Choose Dimensity 8350 if…
  • you are shopping for a upper midrange class processor
  • you are buying one of the devices that use this chip
Go to product page
Choose Dimensity 9500s if…
  • you are shopping for a flagship class processor
  • Efficiency is what decides it for you
  • you are buying one of the devices that use this chip
Go to product page

Frequently asked

Which one is faster?

Clock speed and core count are not directly comparable across architectures, so Kacbu does not score them: it prints them and leaves the decision to the fields that can be measured. Dimensity 9500s leads: overall 47 against 53.

Which is better for gaming?

There is not enough data to decide Graphics / Gaming.

Which is more efficient?

Dimensity 9500s leads on Efficiency.

Which is better for AI?

There is not enough data to decide AI.

Which one should I choose?

Dimensity 9500s leads: overall 47 against 53.

How reliable is this comparison?

Comparison confidence: Low. 5 of 7 comparable specifications are present on both, and 2 independent signals decided it.

This decision engine reads the manufacturers own specification pages. A row that cannot be scored is not scored, and a missing value never hands the other side a win.

General

FamilyDimensity 8000Dimensity 9000
SegmentMobile upper-midrange SoCMobile flagship SoC

CPU

ArchitectureCortex-A715 / Cortex-A510Cortex-X925 / X4 / A720

Graphics / Gaming

Integrated GraphicsMali-G615 MC6Immortalis-G925 MC12

Efficiency

Lithography4 nm3 nm Advantage

General

ManufacturerMediaTekMediaTek
FamilyDimensity 8000Dimensity 9000
SegmentMobile upper-midrange SoCMobile flagship SoC
Release YearShown for context, not scoredNo data2026

CPU

Number of CoresShown for context, not scored88
ThreadShown for context, not scored88
Performance CoreShown for context, not scored44
Efficiency CoreShown for context, not scored44
ArchitectureCortex-A715 / Cortex-A510Cortex-X925 / X4 / A720
Boost frequencyShown for context, not scoredNo data3.73 GHz
Efficiency-Core ClockNo data2.4 GHz
Cache NoteMediaTek does not publish detailed cache sizesNo data

Graphics / Gaming

Integrated GraphicsMali-G615 MC6Immortalis-G925 MC12

Efficiency

Lithography4 nm3 nm Advantage
Manufacturing ProcessThe same fact filed twiceNo data3 nm
Cooling SolutionDevice dependentDevice dependent

Platform

SocketBGA (SoC)BGA (SoC)

Devices using these processors

Dimensity 9500s1 devices