Community in 5 languagesGlobal + local opinion
Trending in United StatesGlobal Top 100What the World SaysCategoriesCountriesHow We Rank
TRENDEESPT
Comparison

Dimensity 7100 vs Dimensity 8500 Ultra

Which processor is better?

Dimensity 8500 Ultra wins

Strong win
Comparison confidence: Medium8 of 9 comparable specifications present on both · 4 independent signals decided this
Spec advantage
Dimensity 71000Dimensity 8500 Ultra4

How many rows each one leads. Not the verdict: a Bluetooth version and CPU performance cannot carry the same weight.

CPU4258
Graphics / Gaming4258
Efficiency4258
AI5050Not decided
Camera & Media5050Not decided
Memory5050Not decided
Connectivity5050Not decided
Why Dimensity 8500 Ultra leads
  • upper midrange class platform against a midrange one
  • Higher-class or newer CPU core: Arm Cortex-A725 against Cortex-A78 / Cortex-A55
  • Newer or wider GPU: Mali-G720 MC8 against Mali-G610 MC2
  • Newer manufacturing process: 4 nm against 6 nm
Which is better for what?
  • GamingDimensity 8500 Ultra
  • AINot enough data
  • CameraNot enough data
  • EfficiencyDimensity 8500 Ultra
  • Device choiceDimensity 8500 Ultra
  • ValueKacbu stores no prices
Choose Dimensity 7100 if…
  • you are shopping for a midrange class processor
  • you are buying one of the devices that use this chip
Go to product page
Choose Dimensity 8500 Ultra if…
  • you are shopping for a upper midrange class processor
  • CPU is what decides it for you
  • Graphics / Gaming is what decides it for you
  • Efficiency is what decides it for you
  • you are buying one of the devices that use this chip
Go to product page

Frequently asked

Which one is faster?

Clock speed and core count are not directly comparable across architectures, so Kacbu does not score them: it prints them and leaves the decision to the fields that can be measured. Dimensity 8500 Ultra leads: overall 43 against 57.

Which is better for gaming?

Dimensity 8500 Ultra leads on Graphics / Gaming.

Which is more efficient?

Dimensity 8500 Ultra leads on Efficiency.

Which is better for AI?

There is not enough data to decide AI.

Which one should I choose?

Dimensity 8500 Ultra leads: overall 43 against 57.

How reliable is this comparison?

Comparison confidence: Medium. 8 of 9 comparable specifications are present on both, and 4 independent signals decided it.

This decision engine reads the manufacturers own specification pages. A row that cannot be scored is not scored, and a missing value never hands the other side a win.

General

FamilyDimensity 7000Dimensity 8000
SegmentMobile midrange SoCMobile upper-midrange SoC

CPU

ArchitectureCortex-A78 / Cortex-A55Arm Cortex-A725 Advantage
Boost frequencyShown for context, not scored2.4 GHz3.4 GHz
Efficiency-Core Clock2 GHz2.2 GHz

Graphics / Gaming

Integrated GraphicsMali-G610 MC2Mali-G720 MC8 Advantage

Efficiency

Lithography6 nm4 nm Advantage

General

ManufacturerMediaTekMediaTek
FamilyDimensity 7000Dimensity 8000
SegmentMobile midrange SoCMobile upper-midrange SoC
Release YearShown for context, not scoredNo data2026

CPU

Number of CoresShown for context, not scored88
ThreadShown for context, not scored88
Performance CoreShown for context, not scored44
Efficiency CoreShown for context, not scored44
ArchitectureCortex-A78 / Cortex-A55Arm Cortex-A725 Advantage
Boost frequencyShown for context, not scored2.4 GHz3.4 GHz
Efficiency-Core Clock2 GHz2.2 GHz
Cache NoteMediaTek does not publish detailed cache sizesNo data

Graphics / Gaming

Integrated GraphicsMali-G610 MC2Mali-G720 MC8 Advantage

Efficiency

Lithography6 nm4 nm Advantage
Manufacturing ProcessThe same fact filed twiceNo data4 nm
Cooling SolutionDevice dependentDevice dependent

Platform

SocketBGA (SoC)BGA (SoC)

Devices using these processors

Dimensity 71001 device
Dimensity 8500 Ultra3 devices