Community in 5 languagesGlobal + local opinion
Trending in United StatesGlobal Top 100What the World SaysCategoriesCountriesHow We Rank
TRENDEESPT
Comparison

Dimensity 7025 vs Dimensity 8500 Ultra

Which processor is better?

Dimensity 8500 Ultra wins

Slight edge
Comparison confidence: Low4 of 7 comparable specifications present on both · 2 independent signals decided this
Spec advantage
Dimensity 70250Dimensity 8500 Ultra2

How many rows each one leads. Not the verdict: a Bluetooth version and CPU performance cannot carry the same weight.

CPU5050Not decided
Graphics / Gaming5050Not decided
Efficiency4258
AI5050Not decided
Camera & Media5050Not decided
Memory5050Not decided
Connectivity5050Not decided
Why Dimensity 8500 Ultra leads
  • upper midrange class platform against a midrange one
  • Newer manufacturing process: 4 nm against 6 nm
Which is better for what?
  • GamingNot enough data
  • AINot enough data
  • CameraNot enough data
  • EfficiencyDimensity 8500 Ultra
  • Device choiceDimensity 8500 Ultra
  • ValueKacbu stores no prices
Choose Dimensity 7025 if…
  • you are shopping for a midrange class processor
  • you are buying one of the devices that use this chip
Go to product page
Choose Dimensity 8500 Ultra if…
  • you are shopping for a upper midrange class processor
  • Efficiency is what decides it for you
  • you are buying one of the devices that use this chip
Go to product page

Frequently asked

Which one is faster?

Clock speed and core count are not directly comparable across architectures, so Kacbu does not score them: it prints them and leaves the decision to the fields that can be measured. Dimensity 8500 Ultra leads: overall 47 against 53.

Which is better for gaming?

There is not enough data to decide Graphics / Gaming.

Which is more efficient?

Dimensity 8500 Ultra leads on Efficiency.

Which is better for AI?

There is not enough data to decide AI.

Which one should I choose?

Dimensity 8500 Ultra leads: overall 47 against 53.

How reliable is this comparison?

Comparison confidence: Low. 4 of 7 comparable specifications are present on both, and 2 independent signals decided it.

This decision engine reads the manufacturers own specification pages. A row that cannot be scored is not scored, and a missing value never hands the other side a win.

General

FamilyDimensity 7000Dimensity 8000
SegmentMobile midrange SoCMobile upper-midrange SoC

CPU

ArchitectureCortex-A78 / Cortex-A55Arm Cortex-A725
Boost frequencyShown for context, not scored2.5 GHz3.4 GHz
Efficiency-Core Clock2 GHz2.2 GHz

Efficiency

Lithography6 nm4 nm Advantage

General

ManufacturerMediaTekMediaTek
FamilyDimensity 7000Dimensity 8000
SegmentMobile midrange SoCMobile upper-midrange SoC
Release YearShown for context, not scoredNo data2026

CPU

Number of CoresShown for context, not scored88
ThreadShown for context, not scored88
Performance CoreShown for context, not scoredNo data4
Efficiency CoreShown for context, not scoredNo data4
ArchitectureCortex-A78 / Cortex-A55Arm Cortex-A725
Boost frequencyShown for context, not scored2.5 GHz3.4 GHz
Efficiency-Core Clock2 GHz2.2 GHz
Cache NoteMediaTek does not publish detailed cache sizesNo data

Graphics / Gaming

Integrated GraphicsNo dataMali-G720 MC8

Efficiency

Lithography6 nm4 nm Advantage
Manufacturing ProcessThe same fact filed twiceNo data4 nm
Cooling SolutionDevice dependentDevice dependent

Platform

SocketBGA (SoC)BGA (SoC)

Devices using these processors

Dimensity 70251 devices
Dimensity 8500 Ultra3 devices