Catalogue in 5 languagesMaker-verified specifications
CategoriesOriginData sources
TRENDEESPT
Comparison

Apple A19 vs Dimensity 8500 Ultra

Which processor is better?

Apple A19 wins

Slight edge
Comparison confidence: Low9 of 11 comparable specifications present on both · 2 independent signals decided this
Spec advantage
Apple A192Dimensity 8500 Ultra3

How many rows each one leads. Not the verdict: a Bluetooth version and CPU performance cannot carry the same weight.

CPU5050Not decided
Graphics / Gaming5050Not decided
Efficiency5842
AI5050Not decided
Camera & Media5050Not decided
Memory5050Not decided
Connectivity5050Not decided
Why Apple A19 leads
  • flagship class platform against a upper midrange one
  • Newer manufacturing process: 3 nm against 4 nm
Which is better for what?
  • GamingNot enough data
  • AINot enough data
  • CameraNot enough data
  • EfficiencyApple A19
  • Device choiceDimensity 8500 Ultra
  • ValueKacbu stores no prices
Choose Apple A19 if…
  • you are shopping for a flagship class processor
  • Efficiency is what decides it for you
  • you are buying one of the devices that use this chip
Go to product page
Choose Dimensity 8500 Ultra if…
  • you are shopping for a upper midrange class processor
  • you are buying one of the devices that use this chip
Go to product page

Frequently asked

Which one is faster?

Clock speed and core count are not directly comparable across architectures, so Kacbu does not score them: it prints them and leaves the decision to the fields that can be measured. Apple A19 leads: overall 53 against 47.

Which is better for gaming?

There is not enough data to decide Graphics / Gaming.

Which is more efficient?

Apple A19 leads on Efficiency.

Which is better for AI?

There is not enough data to decide AI.

Which one should I choose?

Apple A19 leads: overall 53 against 47.

How reliable is this comparison?

Comparison confidence: Low. 9 of 11 comparable specifications are present on both, and 2 independent signals decided it.

This decision engine reads the manufacturers own specification pages. A row that cannot be scored is not scored, and a missing value never hands the other side a win.

General

ManufacturerAppleMediaTek
FamilyApple SiliconDimensity 8000
SegmentMobile flagship SoCMobile upper-midrange SoC
Release YearShown for context, not scored20252026

CPU

Number of CoresShown for context, not scored68
ThreadShown for context, not scored68
Performance CoreShown for context, not scored24
ArchitectureNot decidedARMv9Arm Cortex-A725
Boost frequencyShown for context, not scored4.26 GHz3.4 GHz
Efficiency-Core Clock2.6 GHz2.2 GHz

Graphics / Gaming

Integrated GraphicsNot decidedApple 5-core GPUMali-G720 MC8

Efficiency

Lithography3 nm Advantage4 nm
Cooling SolutionPassive (device-dependent)Device dependent

General

ManufacturerAppleMediaTek
FamilyApple SiliconDimensity 8000
SegmentMobile flagship SoCMobile upper-midrange SoC
Release YearShown for context, not scored20252026

CPU

Number of CoresShown for context, not scored68
ThreadShown for context, not scored68
Performance CoreShown for context, not scored24
Efficiency CoreShown for context, not scored44
ArchitectureNot decidedARMv9Arm Cortex-A725
Boost frequencyShown for context, not scored4.26 GHz3.4 GHz
Efficiency-Core Clock2.6 GHz2.2 GHz
Cache NoteApple does not publish cache sizesNo data

Graphics / Gaming

Integrated GraphicsNot decidedApple 5-core GPUMali-G720 MC8
Donanımsal Işın İzlemeNot decidedYesNo data

AI

Sinirsel Motor16 coresNo data

Memory

Maximum memoryNot decided8 GBNo data

Efficiency

Lithography3 nm Advantage4 nm
Manufacturing ProcessThe same fact filed twiceTSMC N3P4 nm
Cooling SolutionPassive (device-dependent)Device dependent

Platform

SocketBGA (SoC)BGA (SoC)

Devices using these processors