Community in 5 languagesGlobal + local opinion
Trending in United StatesGlobal Top 100What the World SaysCategoriesCountriesHow We Rank
TRENDEESPT
Comparison

AMD Ryzen AI Max 390 vs Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX

Which processor is better?

Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX wins

Slight edge
Comparison confidence: Low11 of 19 comparable specifications present on both · 1 independent signal decided this
Spec advantage
AMD Ryzen AI Max 3902Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX4

How many rows each one leads. Not the verdict: a Bluetooth version and CPU performance cannot carry the same weight.

CPU5050Not decided
Efficiency4258
Graphics / Gaming5050Not decided
Memory5050Not decided
AI5050Not decided
Why Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX leads
  • Newer manufacturing process: TSMC 3nm against TSMC 4nm FinFET
Which is better for what?
  • GamingNot enough data
  • AINot enough data
  • CameraNot enough data
  • EfficiencyIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX
  • Device choiceIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX
  • ValueKacbu stores no prices
Choose AMD Ryzen AI Max 390 if…
  • you are buying one of the devices that use this chip
Go to product page
Choose Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX if…
  • Efficiency is what decides it for you
  • you are buying one of the devices that use this chip
Go to product page

Frequently asked

Which one is faster?

Clock speed and core count are not directly comparable across architectures, so Kacbu does not score them: it prints them and leaves the decision to the fields that can be measured. Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX leads: overall 48 against 52.

Which is better for gaming?

There is not enough data to decide Graphics / Gaming.

Which is more efficient?

Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX leads on Efficiency.

Which is better for AI?

There is not enough data to decide AI.

Which one should I choose?

Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX leads: overall 48 against 52.

How reliable is this comparison?

Comparison confidence: Low. 11 of 19 comparable specifications are present on both, and 1 independent signal decided it.

This decision engine reads the manufacturers own specification pages. A row that cannot be scored is not scored, and a missing value never hands the other side a win.

General

ManufacturerAMDIntel
FamilyRyzen AI Max (Strix Halo)Arrow Lake-HX (Core Ultra 200HX)

CPU

Number of CoresShown for context, not scored1224
ArchitectureNot decided12× Zen 5Lion Cove / Skymont
Boost frequencyShown for context, not scored5 GHz5.4 GHz
Base FrequencyShown for context, not scored3.2 GHz2.7 GHz
L3 cacheShown for context, not scored64 MB36 MB
L2 cacheShown for context, not scored12 MB40 MB

Graphics / Gaming

Integrated GraphicsNot decidedAMD Radeon 8050S (32 cores, 2800 MHz)Intel Arc Graphics (4 Xe cores)

Efficiency

Manufacturing ProcessTSMC 4nm FinFETTSMC 3nm Advantage

General

ManufacturerAMDIntel
FamilyRyzen AI Max (Strix Halo)Arrow Lake-HX (Core Ultra 200HX)
SegmentLaptop FlagshipLaptop Flagship
Release YearShown for context, not scored20252025

CPU

Number of CoresShown for context, not scored1224
ThreadShown for context, not scored2424
Performance CoreShown for context, not scoredNo data8
Efficiency CoreShown for context, not scoredNo data16
ArchitectureNot decided12× Zen 5Lion Cove / Skymont
Boost frequencyShown for context, not scored5 GHz5.4 GHz
Base FrequencyShown for context, not scored3.2 GHz2.7 GHz
L3 cacheShown for context, not scored64 MB36 MB
L2 cacheShown for context, not scored12 MB40 MB

Graphics / Gaming

Integrated GraphicsNot decidedAMD Radeon 8050S (32 cores, 2800 MHz)Intel Arc Graphics (4 Xe cores)

AI

NPU (TOPS)Shown for context, not scored50 TOPS (XDNA 2)No data

Memory

Memory ChannelNot decidedNo data2
Maximum memoryNot decidedNo data256 GB

Efficiency

LithographyNot decidedNo data3 nm
Manufacturing ProcessTSMC 4nm FinFETTSMC 3nm Advantage
TDPShown for context, not scored55 W55 W
Maximum turbo powerShown for context, not scoredNo data160 W
Configurable TDP45-120 WNo data

Platform

SocketNo dataBGA (soldered)
PCIe VersionNot decidedNo dataPCIe 5.0

Devices using these processors