Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 vs Vivo X300 Pro
Which one should you buy?
Who leads where?
- PerformanceVivo X300 Pro
- CameraVivo X300 Pro
- Battery and ChargingVivo X300 Pro
- DesignSamsung Galaxy Z Fold7
Wins are counted from the official values in the table below; the BUY / CONSIDER / WAIT call comes from each product's own decision box. We do not predict prices.
The differences in short
Processor: Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 Snapdragon 8 Elite, Vivo X300 Pro Dimensity 9500. Screen Size: Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 8.0", Vivo X300 Pro 6.78". Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 leads on Main Camera: 200 MP against 50 MP. Vivo X300 Pro leads on Battery: 5440 mAh against 4400 mAh. Vivo X300 Pro leads on Fast Charging: 90 W against 25 W.
Which one for what you do?
Gaming
Vivo X300 Pro
95% – 76%
Photo / Video
Even
83% – 82%
Battery Life
Vivo X300 Pro
73% – 50%
Daily Use
Vivo X300 Pro
76% – 58%
The percentages are Kacbu Match scores: computed from official specifications for that use, with no price in them.
 SamsungSamsung Galaxy Z Fold7No reviews yet |  VivoVivo X300 ProNo reviews yet | |
|---|---|---|
| Key Differences | ||
| Processor | Snapdragon 8 Elite | Dimensity 9500 |
| Screen Size | 8.0" | 6.78" |
| Main Camera | 200 MP | 50 MP |
| Battery | 4400 mAh | 5440 mAh |
| Fast Charging | 25 W | 90 W |
| Display | ||
| Size | 8.0" | 6.78" |
| Panel | Dynamic AMOLED 2X | LTPO AMOLED |
| Resolution | 2184x1968 | 1260x2800 |
| Refresh Rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak Brightness | No data | 2000 nit |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8 Elite | Dimensity 9500 |
| Graphics Processor | No data | Mali G1-Ultra |
| RAM | 12 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage | 256 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage type | No data | UFS 4.1 |
| Manufacturing Technology | No data | 3 nm |
| Camera | ||
| Main Camera | 200 MP | 50 MP |
| Main Aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.57 |
| Ultra Wide | 12 MP | 50 MP |
| Telephoto | 3x | 3.5x periscope |
| Telephoto Resolution | 10 MP | 200 MP 85mm |
| Front Camera | 10 MP | 50 MP |
| Battery and Charging | ||
| Capacity | 4400 mAh | 5440 mAh |
| Wired Charging | 25 W | 90 W |
| Wireless Charging | No data | 40 W |
| Wireless Charging Support | Yes | Yes |
| Design | ||
| Weight | 215 g | 226 g |
| Thickness | 4.2 mm | 8.0 mm |
| Frame | Aluminum | Aluminum |
| Back Surface | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 | Glass |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| SIM | Dual Nano-SIM + eSIM | Dual SIM |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | No data | Yes |
| Durability and security | ||
| IP Certification | IP48 | IP68/IP69 |
| Biometrics | Side-mounted fingerprint | Ultrasonic In-Display Fingerprint |
| Software | ||
| Operating System | Android | Android |
| Version | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| Interface | One UI 8 | OriginOS 6 |
| Multimedia and ports | ||
| Speaker | No data | Stereo |
| USB | No data | USB Type-C |
Vivo X300 Pro leads on 8 of 11 compared specs.
This table is based on manufacturers official specifications. Winning on paper does not always mean a difference in everyday use.