Oppo Find X9 vs Vivo S2
Which one should you buy?
Who leads where?
- DisplayVivo S2
- PerformanceOppo Find X9
- CameraOppo Find X9
- DesignVivo S2
- ConnectivityOppo Find X9
Wins are counted from the official values in the table below; the BUY / CONSIDER / WAIT call comes from each product's own decision box. We do not predict prices.
The differences in short
Processor: Oppo Find X9 Dimensity 9500, Vivo S2 Dimensity 7360. Screen Size: Oppo Find X9 6.59", Vivo S2 6.83". Main Camera is the same on both: 50 MP. Vivo S2 leads on Battery: 7050 mAh against 7025 mAh. Oppo Find X9 leads on Fast Charging: 80 W against 44 W.
Which one for what you do?
Gaming
Oppo Find X9
83% – 58%
Photo / Video
Oppo Find X9
82% – 50%
Battery Life
Even
67% – 68%
Daily Use
Vivo S2
84% – 65%
The percentages are Kacbu Match scores: computed from official specifications for that use, with no price in them.
 OppoOppo Find X9No reviews yet |  VivoVivo S2No reviews yet | |
|---|---|---|
| Key Differences | ||
| Processor | Dimensity 9500 | Dimensity 7360 |
| Screen Size | 6.59" | 6.83" |
| Main Camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Battery | 7025 mAh | 7050 mAh |
| Fast Charging | 80 W | 44 W |
| Display | ||
| Size | 6.59" | 6.83" |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Resolution | 2760x1256 | 1260x2800 |
| Refresh Rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak Brightness | 1800 nit | 3000 nit |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Dimensity 9500 | Dimensity 7360 |
| Graphics Processor | Mali G1-Ultra | No data |
| RAM | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage | 512 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.1 | LPDDR4X + UFS3.1 |
| Manufacturing Technology | 3 nm | 4 nm |
| Camera | ||
| Main Camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main Aperture | f/1.6 | f/1.8 |
| Ultra Wide | 50 MP | No data |
| Telephoto | 3x periscope | No data |
| Telephoto Resolution | 50 MP | No data |
| Front Camera | 50 MP | 32 MP |
| Battery and Charging | ||
| Capacity | 7025 mAh | 7050 mAh |
| Cell Type | Silicon-carbon | No data |
| Wired Charging | 80 W | 44 W |
| Wireless Charging | 50 W | No data |
| Wireless Charging Support | Yes | No data |
| Design | ||
| Weight | 203 g | 197 g |
| Thickness | 7.99 mm | 7.99 mm |
| Frame | Aluminum | No data |
| Back Surface | Glass | Composite plastic |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| SIM | Dual SIM | Dual Nano-SIM |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | No data |
| Bluetooth | 6.0 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Durability and security | ||
| IP Certification | IP68/IP69 | IP68/IP69 |
| Biometrics | In-Screen Fingerprint | Optical In-Display Fingerprint |
| Software | ||
| Operating System | Android | No data |
| Version | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| Interface | ColorOS 16 | OriginOS 6 |
| Multimedia and ports | ||
| Speaker | Stereo | No data |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB 2.0, Type-C |
Oppo Find X9 leads on 7 of 10 compared specs.
This table is based on manufacturers official specifications. Winning on paper does not always mean a difference in everyday use.