Oppo Find X9 vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7
Which one should you buy?
Who leads where?
- PerformanceOppo Find X9
- CameraOppo Find X9
- Battery and ChargingOppo Find X9
Wins are counted from the official values in the table below; the BUY / CONSIDER / WAIT call comes from each product's own decision box. We do not predict prices.
The differences in short
Processor: Oppo Find X9 Dimensity 9500, Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 Snapdragon 8 Elite. Screen Size: Oppo Find X9 6.59", Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 8.0". Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 leads on Main Camera: 200 MP against 50 MP. Oppo Find X9 leads on Battery: 7025 mAh against 4400 mAh. Oppo Find X9 leads on Fast Charging: 80 W against 25 W.
Which one for what you do?
Gaming
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7
76% – 69%
Photo / Video
Even
82% – 83%
Battery Life
Oppo Find X9
85% – 50%
Daily Use
Oppo Find X9
70% – 58%
The percentages are Kacbu Match scores: computed from official specifications for that use, with no price in them.
 OppoOppo Find X9No reviews yet |  SamsungSamsung Galaxy Z Fold7No reviews yet | |
|---|---|---|
| Key Differences | ||
| Processor | Dimensity 9500 | Snapdragon 8 Elite |
| Screen Size | 6.59" | 8.0" |
| Main Camera | 50 MP | 200 MP |
| Battery | 7025 mAh | 4400 mAh |
| Fast Charging | 80 W | 25 W |
| Display | ||
| Size | 6.59" | 8.0" |
| Panel | AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED 2X |
| Resolution | 2760x1256 | 2184x1968 |
| Refresh Rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak Brightness | 1800 nit | No data |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Dimensity 9500 | Snapdragon 8 Elite |
| Graphics Processor | Mali G1-Ultra | No data |
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage | 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.1 | No data |
| Manufacturing Technology | 3 nm | No data |
| Camera | ||
| Main Camera | 50 MP | 200 MP |
| Main Aperture | f/1.6 | f/1.7 |
| Ultra Wide | 50 MP | 12 MP |
| Telephoto | 3x periscope | 3x |
| Telephoto Resolution | 50 MP | 10 MP |
| Front Camera | 50 MP | 10 MP |
| Battery and Charging | ||
| Capacity | 7025 mAh | 4400 mAh |
| Cell Type | Silicon-carbon | No data |
| Wired Charging | 80 W | 25 W |
| Wireless Charging | 50 W | No data |
| Wireless Charging Support | Yes | Yes |
| Design | ||
| Weight | 203 g | 215 g |
| Thickness | 7.99 mm | 4.2 mm |
| Frame | Aluminum | Aluminum |
| Back Surface | Glass | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| SIM | Dual SIM | Dual Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 6.0 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | No data |
| Durability and security | ||
| IP Certification | IP68/IP69 | IP48 |
| Biometrics | In-Screen Fingerprint | Side-mounted fingerprint |
| Software | ||
| Operating System | Android | Android |
| Version | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| Interface | ColorOS 16 | One UI 8 |
| Multimedia and ports | ||
| Speaker | Stereo | No data |
| USB | USB Type-C | No data |
Oppo Find X9 leads on 8 of 10 compared specs.
This table is based on manufacturers official specifications. Winning on paper does not always mean a difference in everyday use.