Apple iPhone 17 Pro vs Oppo Find N5
Which one should you buy?
Who leads where?
- DisplayApple iPhone 17 Pro
- PerformanceOppo Find N5
- CameraApple iPhone 17 Pro
- Battery and ChargingOppo Find N5
- DesignApple iPhone 17 Pro
Wins are counted from the official values in the table below; the BUY / CONSIDER / WAIT call comes from each product's own decision box. We do not predict prices.
The differences in short
Processor: Apple iPhone 17 Pro A19 Pro, Oppo Find N5 Snapdragon 8 Elite. Screen Size: Apple iPhone 17 Pro 6.3", Oppo Find N5 8.12". Oppo Find N5 leads on Main Camera: 50 MP against 48 MP. Oppo Find N5 leads on Battery: 5475 mAh against 3988 mAh. Oppo Find N5 leads on Fast Charging: 80 W against 40 W.
Which one for what you do?
Gaming
Oppo Find N5
90% – 81%
Photo / Video
Apple iPhone 17 Pro
82% – 74%
Battery Life
Oppo Find N5
68% – 61%
Daily Use
Oppo Find N5
84% – 65%
The percentages are Kacbu Match scores: computed from official specifications for that use, with no price in them.
 AppleApple iPhone 17 ProNo reviews yet |  OppoOppo Find N5No reviews yet | |
|---|---|---|
| Key Differences | ||
| Processor | A19 Pro | Snapdragon 8 Elite |
| Screen Size | 6.3" | 8.12" |
| Main Camera | 48 MP | 50 MP |
| Battery | 3988 mAh | 5475 mAh |
| Fast Charging | 40 W | 80 W |
| Display | ||
| Size | 6.3" | 8.12" |
| Panel | Super Retina XDR OLED | AMOLED |
| Resolution | 2622x1206 | 2480x2248 |
| Refresh Rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak Brightness | 3000 nit | 2100 nit |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | A19 Pro | Snapdragon 8 Elite |
| Graphics Processor | Apple 6-core GPU | Adreno 830 |
| RAM | 12 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage | 256 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage type | No data | LPDDR5X + UFS 4.0 |
| Manufacturing Technology | 3 nm | No data |
| Camera | ||
| Main Camera | 48 MP | 50 MP |
| Main Aperture | f/1.78 | f/1.8 |
| Ultra Wide | 48 MP | 8 MP |
| Telephoto | 4x | No data |
| Telephoto Resolution | 48 MP | 50 MP |
| Front Camera | 18 MP | 8 MP |
| Battery and Charging | ||
| Capacity | 3988 mAh | 5475 mAh |
| Wired Charging | 40 W | 80 W |
| Wireless Charging Support | Yes | Yes |
| Design | ||
| Weight | 204 g | 229 g |
| Thickness | 8.75 mm | 8.93 mm |
| Frame | Aluminum Unibody | No data |
| Back Surface | Ceramic Shield | No data |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| SIM | Dual eSIM | Nano SIM + eSIM |
| Satellite Connectivity | Yes | No data |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 6.0 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Durability and security | ||
| IP Certification | IP68 | No data |
| Biometrics | Face ID | No data |
| Software | ||
| Operating System | iOS | No data |
| Version | iOS 26 | No data |
| Multimedia and ports | ||
| Speaker | Stereo | No data |
| Headphone jack | No data | No |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C, USB 3.1 Gen 2 |
The two products are level on the compared specs.
This table is based on manufacturers official specifications. Winning on paper does not always mean a difference in everyday use.