Processor: HMD Fusion Snapdragon 4 Gen 2, Redmi 15C Dimensity 6300. Screen Size: HMD Fusion 6.56", Redmi 15C 6.9". HMD Fusion leads on Main Camera: 108 MP against 50 MP. Redmi 15C leads on Battery: 6000 mAh against 5000 mAh. Fast Charging is the same on both: 33 W.
The percentages are Kacbu Match scores: computed from official specifications for that use, with no price in them.
HMDHMD FusionNo reviews yet | RedmiRedmi 15CNo reviews yet | |
|---|---|---|
| Key Differences | ||
| Processor | Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 | Dimensity 6300 |
| Screen Size | 6.56" | 6.9" |
| Main Camera | 108 MP | 50 MP |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 6000 mAh |
| Fast Charging | 33 W | 33 W |
| Display | ||
| Size | 6.56" | 6.9" |
| Panel | No data | IPS LCD |
| Resolution | 720x1612 | 720x1600 |
| Refresh Rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak Brightness | 600 nit | 810 nit |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 | Dimensity 6300 |
| Graphics Processor | No data | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| RAM | 6 GB | 4 GB |
| Storage | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | No data | UFS 2.2 |
| Manufacturing Technology | No data | 6 nm |
| Camera | ||
| Main Camera | 108 MP | 50 MP |
| Main Aperture | No data | f/1.8 |
| Front Camera | 50 MP | 8 MP |
| Battery and Charging | ||
| Capacity | 5000 mAh | 6000 mAh |
| Wired Charging | 33 W | 33 W |
| Wireless Charging Support | No data | No |
| Design | ||
| Weight | 202.5 g | 211 g |
| Thickness | 8.32 mm | 8.2 mm |
| Frame | No data | Plastic |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| SIM | Nano SIM + eSIM | Dual Nano-SIM |
| Wi-Fi | No data | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.4 |
| NFC | No data | Yes |
| Durability and security | ||
| IP Certification | IP54 | IP64 |
| Biometrics | Side-mounted fingerprint | Side-mounted fingerprint |
| Software | ||
| Operating System | Android | Android |
| Version | Android 14 | Android 15 |
| Interface | No data | HyperOS 2 |
| Update Promise | 2 major OS updates | No data |
| Multimedia and ports | ||
| Speaker | No data | Mono |
| Headphone jack | No data | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
The two products are level on the compared specs.
This table is based on manufacturers official specifications. Winning on paper does not always mean a difference in everyday use.