Processor: HMD Fuse Snapdragon 4 Gen 2, Samsung Galaxy A17 5G Exynos 1330. Screen Size: HMD Fuse 6.56", Samsung Galaxy A17 5G 6.7". HMD Fuse leads on Main Camera: 108 MP against 50 MP. Battery is the same on both: 5000 mAh. HMD Fuse leads on Fast Charging: 33 W against 25 W.
The percentages are Kacbu Match scores: computed from official specifications for that use, with no price in them.
HMDHMD FuseNo reviews yet | SamsungSamsung Galaxy A17 5GNo reviews yet | |
|---|---|---|
| Key Differences | ||
| Processor | Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 | Exynos 1330 |
| Screen Size | 6.56" | 6.7" |
| Main Camera | 108 MP | 50 MP |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Fast Charging | 33 W | 25 W |
| Display | ||
| Size | 6.56" | 6.7" |
| Panel | No data | Super AMOLED |
| Resolution | 720x1612 | 1080x2340 |
| Refresh Rate | 90 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak Brightness | 600 nit | 800 nit |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 | Exynos 1330 |
| Graphics Processor | No data | Mali-G68 MP2 |
| RAM | 6 GB | 6 GB |
| Storage | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Manufacturing Technology | No data | 5 nm |
| Camera | ||
| Main Camera | 108 MP | 50 MP |
| Main Aperture | No data | f/1.8 |
| Ultra Wide | No data | 5 MP |
| Front Camera | 50 MP | 13 MP |
| Battery and Charging | ||
| Capacity | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Wired Charging | 33 W | 25 W |
| Wireless Charging Support | No data | No |
| Design | ||
| Weight | 202.5 g | 192 g |
| Thickness | 8.32 mm | 7.5 mm |
| Frame | No data | Plastic |
| Back Surface | No data | Glass fiber reinforced plastic |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| SIM | Nano SIM + eSIM | Nano SIM + eSIM |
| Wi-Fi | No data | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.3 |
| NFC | No data | Yes |
| Durability and security | ||
| IP Certification | IP54 | IP54 |
| Biometrics | Side-mounted fingerprint | Side-mounted fingerprint |
| Software | ||
| Operating System | Android | Android |
| Version | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| Multimedia and ports | ||
| Speaker | No data | Mono |
| Headphone jack | Yes | No data |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
The two products are level on the compared specs.
This table is based on manufacturers official specifications. Winning on paper does not always mean a difference in everyday use.