Samsung Neo QLED QN90F vs Samsung OLED S95H
Which one should you buy?
Who leads where?
- DisplaySamsung Neo QLED QN90F
- AudioSamsung OLED S95H
Wins are counted from the official values in the table below; the BUY / CONSIDER / WAIT call comes from each product's own decision box. We do not predict prices.
 SamsungSamsung Neo QLED QN90FNo reviews yet |  SamsungSamsung OLED S95HNo reviews yet | |
|---|---|---|
| Key Differences | ||
| Panel | Neo QLED (Mini LED) | OLED |
| Screen Size | 50" | 65" |
| Refresh Rate | 120 Hz | 100 Hz |
| HDMI 2.1 inputs | No data | 4 |
| Sound output (RMS) | 40 W | 70 W |
| Display | ||
| Size | 50" | 65" |
| Panel | Neo QLED (Mini LED) | OLED |
| Resolution | 3840x2160 | 3840x2160 |
| Refresh Rate | 120 Hz | 100 Hz |
| Maximum refresh rate | 165 Hz | 165 Hz |
| Gaming | ||
| HDMI 2.1 inputs | No data | 4 |
| Maximum HDMI signal | No data | 4K 165 Hz |
| Auto low latency mode (ALLM) | Yes | No data |
| AMD FreeSync | FreeSync Premium Pro | FreeSync Premium Pro |
| HGiG | Yes | No data |
| Audio | ||
| Sound output (RMS) | 40 W | 70 W |
| Speaker configuration | No data | 4.2.2 |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | No data |
| Object tracking sound | OTS Lite | OTS+ |
| Smart TV | ||
| Operating System | Tizen | Tizen |
| Security updates guaranteed until (year) | 2030 | No data |
| Apple AirPlay | Yes | No data |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 4 | 4 |
| HDMI eARC | Yes | Yes |
| USB ports | 2 | 3× USB-A, 1× USB-C |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Design | ||
| Depth | 26.9 mm | 11 mm |
| Weight | 13.5 kg | 18.9 kg |
| VESA mount | No data | 400 × 300 mm |
| Energy | ||
| Standby consumption | 0.5 W | 0.5 W |
The two products are level on the compared specs.
This table is based on manufacturers official specifications. Winning on paper does not always mean a difference in everyday use.