Samsung Neo QLED QN70H vs TCL X925
Which one should you buy?
Who leads where?
- DisplayTCL X925
- AudioTCL X925
- ConnectivityTCL X925
Wins are counted from the official values in the table below; the BUY / CONSIDER / WAIT call comes from each product's own decision box. We do not predict prices.
 SamsungSamsung Neo QLED QN70HNo reviews yet |  TCLTCL X925No reviews yet | |
|---|---|---|
| Key Differences | ||
| Panel | Neo QLED (Mini LED) | Mini LED |
| Screen Size | 55" | 75" |
| Refresh Rate | 50 Hz | 120 Hz |
| HDMI 2.1 inputs | 0 | No data |
| Sound output (RMS) | 20 W | 60 W |
| Display | ||
| Size | 55" | 75" |
| Panel | Neo QLED (Mini LED) | Mini LED |
| Resolution | No data | 1673x1010 |
| Refresh Rate | 50 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Gaming | ||
| HDMI 2.1 inputs | 0 | No data |
| Maximum HDMI signal | 4K 60 Hz | No data |
| Auto low latency mode (ALLM) | Yes | Yes |
| HGiG | Yes | No data |
| Audio | ||
| Sound output (RMS) | 20 W | 60 W |
| Dolby Atmos | No data | Yes |
| Object tracking sound | OTS Lite | No data |
| Smart TV | ||
| Operating System | Tizen | Google TV |
| Voice assistants | No data | Google Assistant |
| Apple AirPlay | Yes | No data |
| Google Cast | Yes | No data |
| Matter | Yes | No data |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 3 | 4 |
| HDMI eARC | Yes | Yes |
| USB ports | 2× USB-A | No data |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 5 | No data |
| Design | ||
| Depth | 25.7 mm | No data |
| Weight | 13.8 kg | No data |
| VESA mount | 200 × 200 mm | 400 × 400 mm |
| Energy | ||
| Power consumption (typical) | 62 W | No data |
| Standby consumption | 0.5 W | No data |
TCL X925 leads on 3 of 3 compared specs.
This table is based on manufacturers official specifications. Winning on paper does not always mean a difference in everyday use.