Samsung Neo QLED QN70H vs TCL X11K
Which one should you buy?
Who leads where?
- DisplayTCL X11K
- DesignSamsung Neo QLED QN70H
Wins are counted from the official values in the table below; the BUY / CONSIDER / WAIT call comes from each product's own decision box. We do not predict prices.
 SamsungSamsung Neo QLED QN70HNo reviews yet |  TCLTCL X11KNo reviews yet | |
|---|---|---|
| Key Differences | ||
| Panel | Neo QLED (Mini LED) | QD-Mini LED |
| Screen Size | 55" | 85" |
| Refresh Rate | 50 Hz | 144 Hz |
| HDMI 2.1 inputs | 0 | No data |
| Sound output (RMS) | 20 W | No data |
| Display | ||
| Size | 55" | 85" |
| Panel | Neo QLED (Mini LED) | QD-Mini LED |
| Resolution | No data | 3840x2160 |
| Refresh Rate | 50 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak Brightness | No data | 6500 nits |
| Gaming | ||
| HDMI 2.1 inputs | 0 | No data |
| Maximum HDMI signal | 4K 60 Hz | No data |
| Auto low latency mode (ALLM) | Yes | Yes |
| AMD FreeSync | No data | FreeSync Premium Pro |
| HGiG | Yes | No data |
| Audio | ||
| Sound output (RMS) | 20 W | No data |
| Object tracking sound | OTS Lite | No data |
| Smart TV | ||
| Operating System | Tizen | Google TV |
| Voice assistants | No data | Google Assistant |
| Apple AirPlay | Yes | No data |
| Google Cast | Yes | No data |
| Matter | Yes | No data |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 3 | No data |
| HDMI eARC | Yes | Yes |
| USB ports | 2× USB-A | No data |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | No data | 5.2 |
| Design | ||
| Depth | 25.7 mm | 1082 mm |
| Weight | 13.8 kg | 47.1 kg |
| VESA mount | 200 × 200 mm | 018 × 400 mm |
| Energy | ||
| Power consumption (typical) | 62 W | No data |
| Standby consumption | 0.5 W | No data |
Samsung Neo QLED QN70H leads on 2 of 3 compared specs.
This table is based on manufacturers official specifications. Winning on paper does not always mean a difference in everyday use.