Samsung Neo QLED QN70H vs TCL S5400
Which one should you buy?
Who leads where?
- DisplayTCL S5400
- AudioSamsung Neo QLED QN70H
- DesignTCL S5400
Wins are counted from the official values in the table below; the BUY / CONSIDER / WAIT call comes from each product's own decision box. We do not predict prices.
 SamsungSamsung Neo QLED QN70HNo reviews yet |  TCLTCL S5400No reviews yet | |
|---|---|---|
| Key Differences | ||
| Panel | Neo QLED (Mini LED) | LED |
| Screen Size | 55" | 32" |
| Refresh Rate | 50 Hz | 60 Hz |
| HDMI 2.1 inputs | 0 | No data |
| Sound output (RMS) | 20 W | 2×8 W |
| Display | ||
| Size | 55" | 32" |
| Panel | Neo QLED (Mini LED) | LED |
| Resolution | No data | 800x128 |
| Refresh Rate | 50 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Gaming | ||
| HDMI 2.1 inputs | 0 | No data |
| Maximum HDMI signal | 4K 60 Hz | No data |
| Auto low latency mode (ALLM) | Yes | No data |
| AMD FreeSync | No data | No |
| HGiG | Yes | No data |
| Audio | ||
| Sound output (RMS) | 20 W | 2×8 W |
| Object tracking sound | OTS Lite | No data |
| Smart TV | ||
| Operating System | Tizen | Google TV |
| Voice assistants | No data | Google Assistant |
| Apple AirPlay | Yes | No data |
| Google Cast | Yes | No data |
| Matter | Yes | No data |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 3 | No data |
| HDMI eARC | Yes | No data |
| USB ports | 2× USB-A | 1× USB 2.0 |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 5 | No data |
| Bluetooth | No data | 5.0 |
| Design | ||
| Depth | 25.7 mm | No data |
| Weight | 13.8 kg | 3.4 kg |
| VESA mount | 200 × 200 mm | No data |
| Energy | ||
| Power consumption (typical) | 62 W | No data |
| Standby consumption | 0.5 W | No data |
TCL S5400 leads on 2 of 3 compared specs.
This table is based on manufacturers official specifications. Winning on paper does not always mean a difference in everyday use.