Samsung Neo QLED QN70H vs Samsung OLED S95F
Which one should you buy?
Who leads where?
- DisplaySamsung OLED S95F
- GamingSamsung OLED S95F
- AudioSamsung OLED S95F
- ConnectivitySamsung OLED S95F
- EnergySamsung Neo QLED QN70H
Wins are counted from the official values in the table below; the BUY / CONSIDER / WAIT call comes from each product's own decision box. We do not predict prices.
 SamsungSamsung Neo QLED QN70HNo reviews yet |  SamsungSamsung OLED S95FNo reviews yet | |
|---|---|---|
| Key Differences | ||
| Panel | Neo QLED (Mini LED) | OLED |
| Screen Size | 55" | 65" |
| Refresh Rate | 50 Hz | 100 Hz |
| HDMI 2.1 inputs | 0 | 4 |
| Sound output (RMS) | 20 W | 70 W |
| Display | ||
| Size | 55" | 65" |
| Panel | Neo QLED (Mini LED) | OLED |
| Refresh Rate | 50 Hz | 100 Hz |
| Maximum refresh rate | No data | 165 Hz |
| Gaming | ||
| HDMI 2.1 inputs | 0 | 4 |
| Maximum HDMI signal | 4K 60 Hz | 4K 165 Hz |
| Variable refresh rate (VRR) | No data | Yes |
| Auto low latency mode (ALLM) | Yes | Yes |
| AMD FreeSync | No data | FreeSync Premium Pro |
| HGiG | Yes | Yes |
| Audio | ||
| Sound output (RMS) | 20 W | 70 W |
| Dolby Atmos | No data | Yes |
| Object tracking sound | OTS Lite | OTS+ |
| Smart TV | ||
| Operating System | Tizen | Tizen |
| Apple AirPlay | Yes | Yes |
| Google Cast | Yes | No data |
| Matter | Yes | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 3 | 4 |
| HDMI eARC | Yes | Yes |
| USB ports | 2× USB-A | 3× USB-A, 1× USB-C |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Design | ||
| Depth | 25.7 mm | 11 mm |
| Weight | 13.8 kg | 18.9 kg |
| VESA mount | 200 × 200 mm | 400 × 300 mm |
| Energy | ||
| Power consumption (typical) | 62 W | 100 W |
| Standby consumption | 0.5 W | 0.5 W |
Samsung OLED S95F leads on 5 of 7 compared specs.
This table is based on manufacturers official specifications. Winning on paper does not always mean a difference in everyday use.