ASUS Pad (T3201) vs HONOR MagicPad 3
Which one should you buy?
Who leads where?
- DisplayHONOR MagicPad 3
- Battery and ChargingHONOR MagicPad 3
Wins are counted from the official values in the table below; the BUY / CONSIDER / WAIT call comes from each product's own decision box. We do not predict prices.
The differences in short
Processor: ASUS Pad (T3201) Dimensity 8300, HONOR MagicPad 3 Snapdragon 8 Gen 3. Screen Size: ASUS Pad (T3201) 12.2", HONOR MagicPad 3 13.3". HONOR MagicPad 3 leads on Refresh Rate: 165 Hz against 144 Hz. HONOR MagicPad 3 leads on Battery: 12450 mAh against 9000 mAh.
Which one for what you do?
Films & Video
Even
74% – 73%
Students
Even
62% – 60%
Battery Life
HONOR MagicPad 3
72% – 50%
Thin & Light
ASUS Pad (T3201)
60% – 50%
The percentages are Kacbu Match scores: computed from official specifications for that use, with no price in them.
 ASUSASUS Pad (T3201)No reviews yet |  HonorHONOR MagicPad 3No reviews yet | |
|---|---|---|
| Key Differences | ||
| Processor | Dimensity 8300 | Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 |
| Screen Size | 12.2" | 13.3" |
| Refresh Rate | 144 Hz | 165 Hz |
| Battery | 9000 mAh | 12450 mAh |
| Display | ||
| Size | 12.2" | 13.3" |
| Panel | OLED | LCD |
| Resolution | 2800x1840 | 3200x2136 |
| Refresh Rate | 144 Hz | 165 Hz |
| Peak Brightness | No data | 1000 nit |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Dimensity 8300 | Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 |
| RAM | 8 GB | No data |
| Storage | 128 GB | No data |
| Battery and Charging | ||
| Capacity | 9000 mAh | 12450 mAh |
| Design | ||
| Weight | 520 g | 595 g |
| Thickness | 6.5 mm | 5.79 mm |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| Software | ||
| Operating System | No data | Android |
| Multimedia and ports | ||
| Speaker | 4 Speakers | No data |
| USB | USB-C (USB 3.0) | No data |
HONOR MagicPad 3 leads on 3 of 4 compared specs.
This table is based on manufacturers official specifications. Winning on paper does not always mean a difference in everyday use.