Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra vs ZTE Axon 60 Ultra
Which one should you buy?
Who leads where?
- Battery and ChargingZTE Axon 60 Ultra
- DesignSamsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Wins are counted from the official values in the table below; the BUY / CONSIDER / WAIT call comes from each product's own decision box. We do not predict prices.
 SamsungSamsung Galaxy S25 UltraNo reviews yet |  ZTEZTE Axon 60 UltraNo reviews yet | |
|---|---|---|
| Key Differences | ||
| Processor | Snapdragon 8 Elite | Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 |
| Screen Size | 6.9" | 6.78" |
| Main Camera | 200 MP | 50 MP |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 6000 mAh |
| Fast Charging | 45 W | 80 W |
| Display | ||
| Size | 6.9" | 6.78" |
| Panel | Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X | AMOLED |
| Resolution | 3120x1440 | 1260x2800 |
| Refresh Rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak Brightness | 2600 nit | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8 Elite | Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 |
| Graphics Processor | Adreno 830 | Adreno 740 |
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage | 256 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 4.0 |
| Manufacturing Technology | 3 nm | 4 nm |
| Camera | ||
| Main Camera | 200 MP | 50 MP |
| Main Aperture | f/1.7 | — |
| Ultra Wide | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Telephoto | 50 MP 5x 111mm periscope + 10 MP 3x | — |
| Front Camera | 12 MP | 32 MP |
| Battery and Charging | ||
| Capacity | 5000 mAh | 6000 mAh |
| Wired Charging | 45 W | 80 W |
| Wireless Charging Support | Yes | — |
| Design | ||
| Weight | 218 g | — |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 9.1 mm |
| Frame | Titanium | Aluminum |
| Back Surface | Gorilla Glass Victus 2 | Glass |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| SIM | Nano SIM + eSIM | Dual SIM |
| Satellite Connectivity | No | Yes (Dual Satellite - BDS) |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | — |
| Durability and security | ||
| IP Certification | IP68 | IP68 |
| Biyometrik | Ultrasonic in-display fingerprint | Optical In-Display Fingerprint |
| Software | ||
| Operating System | Android | Android |
| Version | Android 15 (One UI 7) | Android 14 |
| Interface | — | MyOS |
| Multimedia and ports | ||
| Speaker | Stereo | — |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 3.1 |
The two products are level on the compared specs.
This table is based on manufacturers official specifications. Winning on paper does not always mean a difference in everyday use.