Redmi Note 14 vs Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Which one should you buy?
Who leads where?
- DisplaySamsung Galaxy S25 FE
- PerformanceSamsung Galaxy S25 FE
- CameraRedmi Note 14
- DesignSamsung Galaxy S25 FE
Wins are counted from the official values in the table below; the BUY / CONSIDER / WAIT call comes from each product's own decision box. We do not predict prices.
The differences in short
Processor: Redmi Note 14 Helio G99, Samsung Galaxy S25 FE Exynos 2400. Screen Size: Redmi Note 14 6.67", Samsung Galaxy S25 FE 6.7". Redmi Note 14 leads on Main Camera: 108 MP against 50 MP. Redmi Note 14 leads on Battery: 5500 mAh against 4900 mAh. Samsung Galaxy S25 FE leads on Fast Charging: 45 W against 33 W.
Which one for what you do?
Gaming
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
83% – 70%
Photo / Video
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
82% – 68%
Battery Life
Redmi Note 14
68% – 55%
Daily Use
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
87% – 74%
The percentages are Kacbu Match scores: computed from official specifications for that use, with no price in them.
 XiaomiRedmi Note 14No reviews yet |  SamsungSamsung Galaxy S25 FENo reviews yet | |
|---|---|---|
| Key Differences | ||
| Processor | Helio G99 | Exynos 2400 |
| Screen Size | 6.67" | 6.7" |
| Main Camera | 108 MP | 50 MP |
| Battery | 5500 mAh | 4900 mAh |
| Fast Charging | 33 W | 45 W |
| Display | ||
| Size | 6.67" | 6.7" |
| Panel | AMOLED | Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X |
| Resolution | 2400x1080 | 1080x2340 |
| Refresh Rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak Brightness | 1800 nit | 1900 nit |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Helio G99 | Exynos 2400 |
| Graphics Processor | Mali-G57 MC2 | Xclipse 940 |
| RAM | 6 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | LPDDR4X + UFS2.2 | UFS 4.0 |
| Manufacturing Technology | 6 nm | 4 nm |
| Camera | ||
| Main Camera | 108 MP | 50 MP |
| Main Aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.8 |
| Ultra Wide | No data | 12 MP |
| Telephoto | No data | 8 MP 3x 75mm |
| Front Camera | 20 MP | 12 MP |
| Battery and Charging | ||
| Capacity | 5500 mAh | 4900 mAh |
| Wired Charging | 33 W | 45 W |
| Wireless Charging Support | No data | Yes |
| Design | ||
| Weight | 196.5 g | 190 g |
| Thickness | No data | 7.4 mm |
| Frame | No data | Aluminum |
| Back Surface | No data | Gorilla Glass Victus+ |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No data | Yes |
| SIM | No data | Nano SIM + eSIM |
| Wi-Fi | No data | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | No data | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Durability and security | ||
| IP Certification | IP54 | IP68 |
| Biometrics | In-Screen Fingerprint | Optical In-Display Fingerprint |
| Software | ||
| Operating System | No data | Android |
| Version | No data | Android 16 |
| Interface | Xiaomi HyperOS | No data |
| Multimedia and ports | ||
| Speaker | Stereo | Stereo |
| USB | No data | USB Type-C 3.2 |
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE leads on 6 of 10 compared specs.
This table is based on manufacturers official specifications. Winning on paper does not always mean a difference in everyday use.