Oppo Reno14 vs Vivo X200 Pro
Which one should you buy?
Who leads where?
- DisplayVivo X200 Pro
- PerformanceVivo X200 Pro
- Battery and ChargingVivo X200 Pro
- DesignOppo Reno14
Wins are counted from the official values in the table below; the BUY / CONSIDER / WAIT call comes from each product's own decision box. We do not predict prices.
The differences in short
Processor: Oppo Reno14 Dimensity 8350, Vivo X200 Pro Dimensity 9400. Screen Size: Oppo Reno14 6.59", Vivo X200 Pro 6.78". Main Camera is the same on both: 50 MP. Vivo X200 Pro leads on Battery: 5865 mAh against 5840 mAh. Vivo X200 Pro leads on Fast Charging: 90 W against 80 W.
Which one for what you do?
Gaming
Vivo X200 Pro
78% – 70%
Photo / Video
Oppo Reno14
68% – 62%
Battery Life
Vivo X200 Pro
68% – 50%
Daily Use
Vivo X200 Pro
78% – 66%
The percentages are Kacbu Match scores: computed from official specifications for that use, with no price in them.
 OppoOppo Reno14No reviews yet |  VivoVivo X200 ProNo reviews yet | |
|---|---|---|
| Key Differences | ||
| Processor | Dimensity 8350 | Dimensity 9400 |
| Screen Size | 6.59" | 6.78" |
| Main Camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Battery | 5840 mAh | 5865 mAh |
| Fast Charging | 80 W | 90 W |
| Display | ||
| Size | 6.59" | 6.78" |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Resolution | 1256x2760 | 1260x2800 |
| Refresh Rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak Brightness | 1200 nit | 4500 nit |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Dimensity 8350 | Dimensity 9400 |
| Graphics Processor | ARM G615 MC6 | No data |
| RAM | 12 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage | 256 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage type | LPDDR5X + UFS 3.1 | LPDDR5X + UFS 4.0 |
| Manufacturing Technology | No data | 3 nm |
| Camera | ||
| Main Camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.57 |
| Ultra Wide | 8 MP | No data |
| Telephoto Resolution | 50 MP | No data |
| Front Camera | 50 MP | 32 MP |
| Battery and Charging | ||
| Capacity | 5840 mAh | 5865 mAh |
| Wired Charging | 80 W | 90 W |
| Design | ||
| Weight | 187 g | 228 g |
| Thickness | 7.42 mm | 8.49 mm |
| Back Surface | No data | Glass |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| SIM | Nano SIM + eSIM | Dual Nano-SIM |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Durability and security | ||
| IP Certification | No data | IP68/IP69 |
| Biometrics | No data | Ultrasonic In-Display Fingerprint |
| Software | ||
| Version | No data | Android 15 |
| Interface | No data | Funtouch OS_15 |
| Multimedia and ports | ||
| Headphone jack | No | No data |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB 3.2 Gen 1 |
Vivo X200 Pro leads on 6 of 9 compared specs.
This table is based on manufacturers official specifications. Winning on paper does not always mean a difference in everyday use.