Oppo Find X9 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Which one should you buy?
Who leads where?
- DisplayOppo Find X9 Pro
- PerformanceOppo Find X9 Pro
- CameraOppo Find X9 Pro
- Battery and ChargingOppo Find X9 Pro
- DesignSamsung Galaxy S25 FE
Wins are counted from the official values in the table below; the BUY / CONSIDER / WAIT call comes from each product's own decision box. We do not predict prices.
The differences in short
Processor: Oppo Find X9 Pro Dimensity 9500, Samsung Galaxy S25 FE Exynos 2400. Screen Size: Oppo Find X9 Pro 6.78", Samsung Galaxy S25 FE 6.7". Main Camera is the same on both: 50 MP. Oppo Find X9 Pro leads on Battery: 7500 mAh against 4900 mAh. Oppo Find X9 Pro leads on Fast Charging: 80 W against 45 W.
Which one for what you do?
Gaming
Oppo Find X9 Pro
83% – 69%
Photo / Video
Even
82% – 82%
Battery Life
Oppo Find X9 Pro
85% – 55%
Daily Use
Oppo Find X9 Pro
83% – 71%
The percentages are Kacbu Match scores: computed from official specifications for that use, with no price in them.
 OppoOppo Find X9 ProNo reviews yet |  SamsungSamsung Galaxy S25 FENo reviews yet | |
|---|---|---|
| Key Differences | ||
| Processor | Dimensity 9500 | Exynos 2400 |
| Screen Size | 6.78" | 6.7" |
| Main Camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Battery | 7500 mAh | 4900 mAh |
| Fast Charging | 80 W | 45 W |
| Display | ||
| Size | 6.78" | 6.7" |
| Panel | LTPO AMOLED | Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X |
| Resolution | 2772x1272 | 1080x2340 |
| Refresh Rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak Brightness | 3600 nit | 1900 nit |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Dimensity 9500 | Exynos 2400 |
| Graphics Processor | Mali G1-Ultra | Xclipse 940 |
| RAM | 16 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage | 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.1 | UFS 4.0 |
| Manufacturing Technology | 3 nm | 4 nm |
| Camera | ||
| Main Camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Ultra Wide | 50 MP | 12 MP |
| Telephoto | 3x periscope | 8 MP 3x 75mm |
| Telephoto Resolution | 200 MP 70mm | No data |
| Front Camera | 50 MP | 12 MP |
| Battery and Charging | ||
| Capacity | 7500 mAh | 4900 mAh |
| Cell Type | Silicon-carbon | No data |
| Wired Charging | 80 W | 45 W |
| Wireless Charging | 50 W | No data |
| Wireless Charging Support | Yes | Yes |
| Design | ||
| Weight | 224 g | 190 g |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm | 7.4 mm |
| Frame | Aluminum | Aluminum |
| Back Surface | Glass | Gorilla Glass Victus+ |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| SIM | Dual SIM | Nano SIM + eSIM |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 6.0 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Durability and security | ||
| IP Certification | IP68/IP69 | IP68 |
| Biometrics | In-Screen Fingerprint | Optical In-Display Fingerprint |
| Software | ||
| Operating System | Android | Android |
| Version | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| Interface | ColorOS 16 | No data |
| Multimedia and ports | ||
| Speaker | Stereo | Stereo |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 3.2 |
Oppo Find X9 Pro leads on 8 of 10 compared specs.
This table is based on manufacturers official specifications. Winning on paper does not always mean a difference in everyday use.