Nubia RedMagic 11 Pro vs Vivo X200 Pro
Which one should you buy?
Who leads where?
- PerformanceVivo X200 Pro
- CameraVivo X200 Pro
- DesignVivo X200 Pro
Wins are counted from the official values in the table below; the BUY / CONSIDER / WAIT call comes from each product's own decision box. We do not predict prices.
The differences in short
Processor: Nubia RedMagic 11 Pro Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Vivo X200 Pro Dimensity 9400. Screen Size: Nubia RedMagic 11 Pro 6.85", Vivo X200 Pro 6.78". Main Camera is the same on both: 50 MP. Nubia RedMagic 11 Pro leads on Battery: 7500 mAh against 5865 mAh. Vivo X200 Pro leads on Fast Charging: 90 W against 80 W.
Which one for what you do?
Gaming
Nubia RedMagic 11 Pro
85% – 78%
Photo / Video
Even
61% – 62%
Battery Life
Nubia RedMagic 11 Pro
85% – 50%
Daily Use
Nubia RedMagic 11 Pro
71% – 66%
The percentages are Kacbu Match scores: computed from official specifications for that use, with no price in them.
 NubiaNubia RedMagic 11 ProNo reviews yet |  VivoVivo X200 ProNo reviews yet | |
|---|---|---|
| Key Differences | ||
| Processor | Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | Dimensity 9400 |
| Screen Size | 6.85" | 6.78" |
| Main Camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Battery | 7500 mAh | 5865 mAh |
| Fast Charging | 80 W | 90 W |
| Display | ||
| Size | 6.85" | 6.78" |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Resolution | 1216x2688 | 1260x2800 |
| Refresh Rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak Brightness | 1800 nit | 4500 nit |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | Dimensity 9400 |
| Graphics Processor | Adreno 840 | No data |
| RAM | 12 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage | 256 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.1 Pro | LPDDR5X + UFS 4.0 |
| Manufacturing Technology | 3 nm | 3 nm |
| Camera | ||
| Main Camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main Aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.57 |
| Ultra Wide | 50 MP | No data |
| Front Camera | 16 MP | 32 MP |
| Battery and Charging | ||
| Capacity | 7500 mAh | 5865 mAh |
| Wired Charging | 80 W | 90 W |
| Wireless Charging | 80 W | No data |
| Wireless Charging Support | Yes | No data |
| Design | ||
| Weight | 230 g | 228 g |
| Thickness | 8.9 mm | 8.49 mm |
| Frame | Aluminum | No data |
| Back Surface | Glass | Glass |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| SIM | Dual SIM | Dual Nano-SIM |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6E/7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Durability and security | ||
| IP Certification | IPX8 | IP68/IP69 |
| Biometrics | Ultrasonic In-Display Fingerprint | Ultrasonic In-Display Fingerprint |
| Software | ||
| Operating System | Android | No data |
| Version | Android 16 | Android 15 |
| Interface | RedMagic OS 11 | Funtouch OS_15 |
| Multimedia and ports | ||
| Speaker | Stereo | No data |
| Headphone jack | Yes (3.5mm) | No data |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2 Gen 2 | USB 3.2 Gen 1 |
Vivo X200 Pro leads on 8 of 10 compared specs.
This table is based on manufacturers official specifications. Winning on paper does not always mean a difference in everyday use.