Motorola Edge 70 Max vs Vivo X300 FE
Which one should you buy?
Who leads where?
- DisplayMotorola Edge 70 Max
- PerformanceMotorola Edge 70 Max
- CameraVivo X300 FE
- Battery and ChargingMotorola Edge 70 Max
- DesignVivo X300 FE
Wins are counted from the official values in the table below; the BUY / CONSIDER / WAIT call comes from each product's own decision box. We do not predict prices.
The differences in short
Processor is the same on both: Snapdragon 8 Gen 5. Screen Size: Motorola Edge 70 Max 6.82", Vivo X300 FE 6.31". Main Camera is the same on both: 50 MP. Motorola Edge 70 Max leads on Battery: 7100 mAh against 6500 mAh. Fast Charging is the same on both: 90 W.
Which one for what you do?
Gaming
Motorola Edge 70 Max
96% – 76%
Photo / Video
Vivo X300 FE
68% – 61%
Battery Life
Motorola Edge 70 Max
85% – 50%
Daily Use
Motorola Edge 70 Max
83% – 54%
The percentages are Kacbu Match scores: computed from official specifications for that use, with no price in them.
 MotorolaMotorola Edge 70 MaxNo reviews yet |  VivoVivo X300 FENo reviews yet | |
|---|---|---|
| Key Differences | ||
| Processor | Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 | Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 |
| Screen Size | 6.82" | 6.31" |
| Main Camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Battery | 7100 mAh | 6500 mAh |
| Fast Charging | 90 W | 90 W |
| Display | ||
| Size | 6.82" | 6.31" |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Resolution | 1440x3200 | 1216x2640 |
| Refresh Rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak Brightness | 7000 nit | 5000 nit |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 | Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 |
| Graphics Processor | Adreno GPU | No data |
| RAM | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | No data | LPDDR5X Ultra + UFS 4.1 |
| Manufacturing Technology | 3 nm | 3 nm |
| Camera | ||
| Main Camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.57 |
| Ultra Wide | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| Telephoto Resolution | No data | 50 MP |
| Front Camera | 32 MP | 50 MP |
| Battery and Charging | ||
| Capacity | 7100 mAh | 6500 mAh |
| Wired Charging | 90 W | 90 W |
| Wireless Charging | 25 W | No data |
| Wireless Charging Support | Yes | No data |
| Design | ||
| Weight | 221 g | 191 g |
| Thickness | 8.22 mm | 7.99 mm |
| Frame | Aluminum | No data |
| Back Surface | Glass | Glass |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| SIM | Dual SIM | Dual Nano-SIM |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | No data |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 6.0 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Durability and security | ||
| IP Certification | IP68/IP69 | IP68/IP69 |
| Biometrics | In-Screen Fingerprint | Ultrasonic In-Display Fingerprint |
| Military Standard | MIL-STD-810H | No data |
| Software | ||
| Operating System | Android | No data |
| Version | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| Interface | Hello UI | OriginOS 6 |
| Multimedia and ports | ||
| Speaker | Stereo | No data |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C, USB 2.0 |
The two products are level on the compared specs.
This table is based on manufacturers official specifications. Winning on paper does not always mean a difference in everyday use.