HONOR Magic V6 vs Vivo X300 Ultra
Which one should you buy?
Who leads where?
- DisplayHONOR Magic V6
- CameraVivo X300 Ultra
- Battery and ChargingVivo X300 Ultra
Wins are counted from the official values in the table below; the BUY / CONSIDER / WAIT call comes from each product's own decision box. We do not predict prices.
The differences in short
Processor is the same on both: Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. Screen Size: HONOR Magic V6 7.95", Vivo X300 Ultra 6.83". Vivo X300 Ultra leads on Main Camera: 200 MP against 50 MP. Vivo X300 Ultra leads on Battery: 6600 mAh against 6510 mAh. Vivo X300 Ultra leads on Fast Charging: 100 W against 80 W.
Which one for what you do?
Gaming
Vivo X300 Ultra
73% – 56%
Photo / Video
Vivo X300 Ultra
88% – 68%
Battery Life
Vivo X300 Ultra
85% – 50%
Daily Use
Vivo X300 Ultra
67% – 60%
The percentages are Kacbu Match scores: computed from official specifications for that use, with no price in them.
 HonorHONOR Magic V6No reviews yet |  VivoVivo X300 UltraNo reviews yet | |
|---|---|---|
| Key Differences | ||
| Processor | Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 |
| Screen Size | 7.95" | 6.83" |
| Main Camera | 50 MP | 200 MP |
| Battery | 6510 mAh | 6600 mAh |
| Fast Charging | 80 W | 100 W |
| Display | ||
| Size | 7.95" | 6.83" |
| Panel | Foldable OLED | LTPO AMOLED |
| Resolution | 2352x2172 | 1440x3168 |
| Refresh Rate | No data | 144 Hz |
| Peak Brightness | 6000 nit | 1935 nit |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 |
| Graphics Processor | Adreno 840 | Adreno 840 |
| RAM | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage | 512 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage type | No data | UFS 4.1 |
| Manufacturing Technology | No data | 3 nm |
| Camera | ||
| Main Camera | 50 MP | 200 MP |
| Main Aperture | f/1.6 | f/1.9 |
| Ultra Wide | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Telephoto | No data | 3.7x periscope |
| Telephoto Resolution | 64 MP | 200 MP |
| Front Camera | 20 MP | 50 MP |
| Battery and Charging | ||
| Capacity | 6510 mAh | 6600 mAh |
| Cell Type | No data | Silicon-carbon |
| Wired Charging | 80 W | 100 W |
| Wireless Charging | 66 W | 40 W |
| Wireless Charging Support | No data | Yes |
| Design | ||
| Weight | 219 g | 232 g |
| Thickness | White Version: folded: 8.75 mm unfolded: 4.0 mm Other Version: folded: 9.0 mm unfolded: 4.1 mm | 8.2 mm |
| Frame | No data | Aluminum |
| Back Surface | No data | Glass |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| SIM | Dual SIM + eSIM | Dual SIM |
| Satellite Connectivity | No data | Yes (16GB+1TB) |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 6.0 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Durability and security | ||
| IP Certification | IP68&IP69 | IP68/IP69 |
| Biometrics | No data | Ultrasonic In-Display Fingerprint |
| Software | ||
| Operating System | Android | Android |
| Version | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| Interface | MagicOS 10 | OriginOS 6 |
| Multimedia and ports | ||
| Speaker | No data | Stereo |
| USB | No data | USB Type-C |
Vivo X300 Ultra leads on 6 of 10 compared specs.
This table is based on manufacturers official specifications. Winning on paper does not always mean a difference in everyday use.