HONOR Magic V5 vs Oppo Reno14 Pro
Which one should you buy?
Who leads where?
- DisplayHONOR Magic V5
- PerformanceHONOR Magic V5
- CameraHONOR Magic V5
- Battery and ChargingOppo Reno14 Pro
- DesignOppo Reno14 Pro
Wins are counted from the official values in the table below; the BUY / CONSIDER / WAIT call comes from each product's own decision box. We do not predict prices.
The differences in short
Processor: HONOR Magic V5 Snapdragon 8 Elite, Oppo Reno14 Pro Dimensity 8450. Screen Size: HONOR Magic V5 7.95", Oppo Reno14 Pro 6.83". Main Camera is the same on both: 50 MP. Oppo Reno14 Pro leads on Battery: 6058 mAh against 5690 mAh. Oppo Reno14 Pro leads on Fast Charging: 80 W against 66 W.
Which one for what you do?
Gaming
HONOR Magic V5
82% – 70%
Photo / Video
Even
68% – 68%
Battery Life
Oppo Reno14 Pro
68% – 50%
Daily Use
HONOR Magic V5
78% – 74%
The percentages are Kacbu Match scores: computed from official specifications for that use, with no price in them.
 HonorHONOR Magic V5No reviews yet |  OppoOppo Reno14 ProNo reviews yet | |
|---|---|---|
| Key Differences | ||
| Processor | Snapdragon 8 Elite | Dimensity 8450 |
| Screen Size | 7.95" | 6.83" |
| Main Camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Battery | 5690 mAh | 6058 mAh |
| Fast Charging | 66 W | 80 W |
| Display | ||
| Size | 7.95" | 6.83" |
| Panel | Foldable OLED | AMOLED |
| Resolution | 2352x2172 | 1272x2800 |
| Refresh Rate | No data | 120 Hz |
| Peak Brightness | 5000 nit | 1200 nit |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8 Elite | Dimensity 8450 |
| Graphics Processor | Adreno 830 | ARM G720 MC7 |
| RAM | 16 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage | 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | No data | LPDDR5X + UFS 3.1 |
| Camera | ||
| Main Camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main Aperture | f/1.6 | f/1.8 |
| Ultra Wide | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Telephoto Resolution | 64 MP | 50 MP |
| Front Camera | 20 MP | 50 MP |
| Battery and Charging | ||
| Capacity | 5690 mAh | 6058 mAh |
| Wired Charging | 66 W | 80 W |
| Wireless Charging | 50 W | No data |
| Wireless Charging Support | No data | Yes |
| Design | ||
| Weight | 217 g | 201 g |
| Thickness | Ivory White Version: folded: 8.8 mm unfolded: 4.1 mm Other Version: folded: 9 mm unfolded: 4.2 mm | 7.48 mm |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| SIM | Dual SIM + eSIM | Nano SIM + eSIM |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 6.0 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Durability and security | ||
| IP Certification | IP58&IP59 | No data |
| Software | ||
| Operating System | Android | No data |
| Version | Android 15 | No data |
| Interface | MagicOS 9.0.1 | No data |
| Multimedia and ports | ||
| Headphone jack | No data | No |
| USB | No data | USB Type-C |
The two products are level on the compared specs.
This table is based on manufacturers official specifications. Winning on paper does not always mean a difference in everyday use.