Google Pixel 11 Pro XL vs Tecno PHANTOM V Flip2 5G
Which one should you buy?
Who leads where?
- PerformanceGoogle Pixel 11 Pro XL
- DesignTecno PHANTOM V Flip2 5G
Wins are counted from the official values in the table below; the BUY / CONSIDER / WAIT call comes from each product's own decision box. We do not predict prices.
 GoogleGoogle Pixel 11 Pro XLNo reviews yet |  TecnoTecno PHANTOM V Flip2 5GNo reviews yet | |
|---|---|---|
| Key Differences | ||
| Processor | Google Tensor G6 | Dimensity 8050 |
| Screen Size | 6.8" | 6.9" |
| Main Camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Battery | 5115 mAh | 4720 mAh |
| Fast Charging | 45 W | 70 W |
| Display | ||
| Size | 6.8" | 6.9" |
| Panel | LTPO OLED | AMOLED |
| Resolution | 1344x2992 | 1080x2640 |
| Refresh Rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak Brightness | 3600 nit | No data |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Google Tensor G6 | Dimensity 8050 |
| Graphics Processor | PowerVR CXTP-48-1536 | No data |
| RAM | 16 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage | 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | No data |
| Manufacturing Technology | 3 nm | No data |
| Camera | ||
| Main Camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main Aperture | f/1.7 | No data |
| Ultra Wide | 48 MP | 50 MP |
| Telephoto | 48 MP 5x 106mm periscope | No data |
| Front Camera | 42 MP | 32 MP |
| Battery and Charging | ||
| Capacity | 5115 mAh | 4720 mAh |
| Wired Charging | 45 W | 70 W |
| Wireless Charging Support | Yes | No data |
| Design | ||
| Weight | 226 g | 196 g |
| Thickness | 8.5 mm | 7.64 mm |
| Frame | Aluminum | No data |
| Back Surface | Gorilla Glass Victus 2 | No data |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| SIM | Nano SIM + eSIM | No data |
| Satellite Connectivity | Satellite SOS | No data |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 6.0 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | No data |
| Durability and security | ||
| IP Certification | IP68 | No data |
| Biometrics | Ultrasonic in-display fingerprint | In-Screen Fingerprint |
| Software | ||
| Operating System | Android | Android |
| Version | Android 17 | Android 14 |
| Multimedia and ports | ||
| Speaker | Stereo | No data |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2 | No data |
The two products are level on the compared specs.
This table is based on manufacturers official specifications. Winning on paper does not always mean a difference in everyday use.